For productive discussions - let's get back to the basics of good discussion

How are you?

We already have good guidelines for productive discussions, but it seems that in practice they are often not followed. - Frequently Asked Questions

It seems to me that we can find a better alternative or give a positive review, but instead we seem to emphasize the opposite, the logic of disagreement.
I believe that productive ideas come from positive responses, and I believe that all ideas are better when they are positive.(So in some idea meetings, we try to avoid using negative language.)
And often a small number of loud users lead the discussion.
I don’t believe in limiting the voices of the loudest, I believe in encouraging more people to voice their opinions.
(In particular, users who don’t speak English well, or those from shy regions, are often hesitant to chime in on discussions.)
I also think we need a little bit more mediation, and that mediation is not only necessary when there is a dispute.
Someone like me might not be able to focus the discussion due to limitations in English, and I think a moderator is needed in those cases as well (it’s better than being intimidated into giving an opinion by a snarky person).
I also think it’s necessary to keep the discussion centered on the person or opinion that sometimes derails it.

Finally, is it not possible to have the FAQ translated into multiple languages?
It would be nice to have each language user do the translation, and have it appear based on their preferred language.
It’s a pity that there are such good guidelines, but not many people know about them.
Thank you.

3 posts - 3 participants

Read full topic

Ce sujet de discussion accompagne la publication sur