Hello,
I’m a bit confused about the right sequences for the role:forward role:backward
Let me explain:
I have a long road (I want to manage in a relation), where sometimes it gets 2 oneway carriages (with bridges, tunnels, etc…).
In the oneway parts I add role:forward or role:backward.
While for the role:forward there isn’t any problem, I’m not sure how to sort the backwards members. In the following drawn I put the 2 cases.
In a logical way, in the relation I would sort members in the same direction as I drive, so travelling in the backward direction I’d sort as in the case 1.
Uh, as the schema doesn’t keep formatted, I add the link for the schema’s image https://ibb.co/BfTh1cc
Thank you, happy mapping.
Alessandro
Case 1
|
|
| no role
|
/ \
/ \
forward1 | | backward2
| |
| |
| |
| |
forward2 \ / backward1
\ /
|
| no role
|
Case 2
|
|
| no role
|
/
/
forward1 | | backward1
| |
| |
| |
| |
forward2 \ / backward2
\ /
|
| no role
|
11 posts - 7 participants
Ce sujet de discussion accompagne la publication sur https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/role-forward-role-backward-in-route-relations/97435