When mapping a running track (athletics for non-American English speakers) Is there any reason to prefer leisure=track over leisure=pitch, pitch=athletics? I have always thought that areas were better as they express more detail, but I can sort of see an argument for using a linear way given the fact that people use tracks. The issue with leisure=track is that they probably won’t be used for routing given that they are not highways and routing for someone running on a track seems like overkill.
5 posts - 3 participants
Ce sujet de discussion accompagne la publication sur https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/running-tracks-leisure-pitch-area-vs-leisure-track-way/101476