StreetComplete and redundant surface tags at segregated paths

Is this the way it should be? Is this redundancy necessary and wanted?

highway=path
foot=designated
bicycle=designated
segregated=yes

cycleway:surface=paving_stones
footway:surface=paving_stones
surface=paving_stones

surface and cycleway:surface were added by one StreetComplete 49.2 changeset.

11 posts - 4 participants

Read full topic


Ce sujet de discussion accompagne la publication sur https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/streetcomplete-and-redundant-surface-tags-at-segregated-paths/5569