Surface=fine_gravel - is it for loose gravel or duplicate of surface=compacted

[system]

I always seen and used surface=fine_gravel for loose small gravel such as for example

File:Gravel road with loose gravel closeup.jpg

But Tag:surface=fine_gravel - OpenStreetMap Wiki claims that is should/is used for

multilayer pavement with a stone or gravel basis and a topmost surface of firm, granular grit, basalt or quartz (typically <5mm), as invented by the Roman empire. Easy to walk, jog, cycle or ride on. In hilly areas, mostly with drainage channels and concave cross-section for proper water shedding. Motorized vehicles will not move stones if the way is maintained properly, and bicycles tires will not leave any imprints, at least in dry weather. If the topmost surface is eroded or loose gravel aggravate, please use gravel instead.

Is OSM Wiki wrong since this ancient edit and should be edited?

Have I used surface=fine_gravel incorrectly?

How to tag surface of fine loose gravel?

Note that OSM Wiki summary descriptions are quite suspicious as for years they claimed that neither surface=gravel nor surface=fine_gravel is used for such surface which seems clearly mismatching actual tagging.

What should be listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Map_Features:surface and Tag:surface=fine_gravel - OpenStreetMap Wiki as actual tag meaning?

40 posts - 15 participants

Read full topic

---

Ce sujet de discussion accompagne la publication sur https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/surface-fine-gravel-is-it-for-loose-gravel-or-duplicate-of-surface-compacted/7533