There are some features where marking them as disused is not really valid (
We have some features which are still the same landform even if not in active commercial operation (for
disused=yes would be the best marker to classify them as disused)
The same goes for abandoned buildings - abandoned building is still building so
building=* abandoned=yes works well.
On the other hand inactive shop is no longer place where you may buy or sell things, so closed down supermarket with shell of former shop (signs, interior etc) would be best tagged as
What would be the best tagging for disused inactive water well? What would be the friendliest for other mappers, editor software and (to lesser degree) for data consumers?
man_made=water_well disused=yes (treating water well as landform)
disused:man_made=water_well (treating water well as POI)
First one requires checking at least for
operational_status=non-operational to skip inactive ones.
Second one requires checking at least
ruined:man_made=water_well if you want to handle also inactive ones.
Is it useful to make edits changing
3 posts - 1 participant
Ce sujet de discussion accompagne la publication sur https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-inactive-water-wells-man-made-water-well-disused-yes-vs-disused-man-made-water-well/97827