Hi all,
The lanes=*
key is, according to its wiki page, only to be used for highway=*
elements. Yet other mappable features can have lanes.
Three that immediately spring to mind are running tracks, swimming pools, and 10 pin bowling alleys.
- For running tracks (amongst other types included in
leisure=track
), the wiki recommends usinglanes=*
in contradiction to that key’s own page. - For swimming pools, the key
swimming_lanes=*
is in use. - For bowling alleys, no guidance is given though I did start a talk topic about this a while back (with no responses).
I think it would be useful for us to agree on a consistent approach here.
Should lanes=*
only be used in conjunction with highway=*
? If so:
-
Why? Surely data consumers aren’t expecting
lanes=*
as a stand-alone tag, so it’s straightforward enough to understand the context based on the primary tag. Why should usage be exclusive to highways? We don’t restrictsurface=*
just to highways for example. -
How should “lanes” for other features be mapped? Does it make sense to keep creating new keys for each feature (e.g.
swimming_lanes=*
,bowling_lanes=*
etc.)? -
Perhaps using some namespace tagging? E.g.,
swimming_pool:lanes=*
,bowling_alleys:lanes=*
(or evenhighway:lanes=*
).
Interested to hear your thoughts…
27 posts - 11 participants
Ce sujet de discussion accompagne la publication sur https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-number-of-lanes-for-non-highway-features/101355