Is there a clear preference among Norway community for either:
-
using
wikipedia
tag only (like on Node: Colesbukta (10253369144) | OpenStreetMap ) [for human readability] -
using
wikidata
tag only (like on Node: Fosser (10093288766) | OpenStreetMap ) [for stability of link, as Wikidata identifiers are more stable than article names] -
using both
wikidata
andwikipedia
(like on Relation: Bergen (404159) | OpenStreetMap ) [for having bot link stability and human readability] -
considering all variants as equally fine [for avoiding any edits that would add matching
wikidata
or matchingwikipedia
or remove one of this tags] -
no clear consensus
?
6 posts - 4 participants
Ce sujet de discussion accompagne la publication sur https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wikipedia-vs-wikidata-vs-wikipedia-and-wikidata/100803